Establish Evaluation Criteria
Establish and maintain the criteria for evaluating alternatives, and
the relative ranking of these criteria.
The evaluation criteria provide the basis for evaluating alternative
solutions. The criteria are ranked so that the highest ranked criteria
exert the most influence on the evaluation. [PA156.IG101.SP103.N101]
This process area is referenced by many other process areas in the
model, and there are many contexts in which a formal evaluation
process can be used. Therefore, in some situatio
Document the evaluation criteria to minimize the possibility that
decisions will be second-guessed, or that the reason for making the
decision will be forgotten. Decisions based on criteria that are explicitly
defined and established remove barriers to stakeholder buy-in.
- Define the criteria for evaluating alternative solutions.
Criteria should be traceable to requirements, scenarios, business case
assumptions, business objectives, or other documented sources.
Types of criteria to consider include:
- Technology limitations
- Environmental impact
- Risks
- Total ownership and life-cycle costs
- Define the range and scale for ranking the evaluation criteria.
Scales of relative importance for evaluation criteria can be established with nonnumeric
values or with formulas that relate the evaluation parameter to a
numerical weight.
- Rank the criteria.
The criteria are ranked according to the defined range and scale to reflect the
needs, objectives, and priorities of the relevant stakeholders.
- Assess the criteria and their relative importance.
- Evolve the evaluation criteria to improve their validity.
- Document the rationale for the selection and rejection of evaluation
criteria.
Documentation of selection criteria and rationale may be needed to justify
solutions or for future reference and use.