Here “home organization” refers to that part of the organization to which personnel are assigned when they are not in an integrated team. This home organization may be called the “functional organization,” “home base,” “home office,” or “direct organization.” Regardless of what it is called, it is often responsible for the career growth of the personnel assigned to it (e.g., performance appraisals and training to maintain functional and discipline expertise). In an IPPD environment, reporting procedures and rating systems should recognize that people’s responsibility is focused on the integrated team, not on the traditional home organization. A balance must be struck, however, because the responsibility of integrated team members to their respective home organizations is still important, specifically for process implementation and improvement. Workloads should be balanced between projects and functions, while ensuring career growth and advancement. Mechanisms should be created that support the home organization responsibility but align the work force to meet business objectives in a teaming environment.
Striking this balance is difficult for an organization but exceedingly important for the personnel and the success of IPPD implementation. The balance must be reflected in the personal or career development plans for each individual. The knowledge and skills needed for an individual to succeed in both their functional and integrated team role should be honed, taking into account current and future assignments.
Guidelines should also be in place for disbanding teams and maintaining home organizations. It has been observed that sometimes teams attempt to remain in place beyond their productive life in organizations that do not have a home organization for the team members to report back to after the team is dissolved.