0 Non-existent | The organisation lacks procedures to
monitor the effectiveness of internal controls.
Management internal control reporting methods are
absent. There is a general unawareness of IT operational
security and internal control assurance. Management and
employees have an overall lack of awareness of internal
controls.
|
1 (Initial/Ad Hoc) | The organisation has a lack of
management commitment for regular operational security
and internal control assurance. Individual expertise in
assessing internal control adequacy is applied on an ad
hoc basis. IT management has not formally assigned
responsibility for monitoring effectiveness of internal
controls. IT internal control assessments are conducted
as part of traditional financial audits, with methodologies
and skill sets that do not reflect the needs of the
information services function.
|
2 (Repeatable but Intuitive) | The organisation uses
informal control reports to initiate corrective action
initiatives. Planning and management processes are
defined, but assessment is dependent on the skill sets of
key individuals. The organisation has an increased
awareness of internal control monitoring. Management
has begun to establish basic metrics. Information
services management performs monitoring over the
effectiveness of critical internal controls on a regular
basis. Controls over security are monitored and results
are reviewed regularly. Methodologies and tools specific
to the IT environment are starting to be used, but not
consistently. Skilled IT staff is routinely participating in
internal control assessments. Risk factors specific to the
IT environment are being defined.
|
3 (Defined Process) | Management supports and has
institutionalised internal control monitoring. Policies and
procedures have been developed for assessing and
reporting on internal control monitoring activities. A metrics knowledge base for historical information on
internal control monitoring is being established. An
education and training program for internal control
monitoring has been implemented. Peer reviews for
internal control monitoring have been established. Self assessments
and internal controls assurance reviews are
established over operational security and internal control
assurance and involve information services function
management working with business managers. Tools are
being utilised but are not necessarily integrated into all
processes. IT process risk assessment policies are being
used within control frameworks developed specifically
for the IT organisation. The information system services
function is developing its own, technically oriented, IT
internal control capabilities.
|
4 (Managed and Measurable) | Management has
established benchmarking and quantitative goals for
internal control review processes. The organisation
established tolerance levels for the internal control
monitoring process. Integrated and increasingly
automated tools are incorporated into internal control
review processes, with an increased use of quantitative
analysis and control. Process-specific risks and
mitigation policies are defined for the entire information
services function. A formal IT internal control function
is established, with specialised and certified professionals
utilising a formal control framework endorsed by senior
management. Benchmarking against industry standards
and development of best practices is being formalised.
|
5 Optimized | Management has established an
organisation-wide continuous improvement program that
takes into account lessons learned and industry best
practices for internal control monitoring. The
organisation uses state of the art tools that are integrated
and updated, where appropriate. Knowledge sharing is
formalised and formal training programs, specific to the
information services function, are implemented. IT
control frameworks address not only IT technical issues,
but are integrated with organisation-wide frameworks
and methodologies to ensure consistency with
organisation goals.
|