0 Non-existent | There is no awareness of the importance
of the information architecture for the organization. The
knowledge, expertise and responsibilities necessary to
develop this architecture do not exist in the organization.
|
1 (Initial/Ad Hoc) | Recognizes the need for an
information architecture, but has not formalized either a
process or a plan to develop one. Isolated and reactive
development of components of an information
architecture is occurring. There are isolated and partial
implementations of data diagrams, documentation, and
data syntax rules. The definitions address data, rather
than information, and are driven by application software
vendor offerings. There is inconsistent and sporadic
communication of the need for an information
architecture.
|
2 (Repeatable but Intuitive) | There is an awareness of the
importance of an information architecture for the
organisation. A process emerges and similar, though
informal and intuitive, procedures are followed by
different individuals within the organisation. There is no
formal training and people obtain their skills through
hands-on experience and repeated application of
techniques. Tactical requirements drive the development
of information architecture components by individuals.
|
3 (Defined Process) | The importance of the information
architecture is understood and accepted, and
responsibility for its delivery is assigned and clearly
communicated. Related procedures, tools and techniques,
although not sophisticated, have been standardised and
documented and are part of informal training activities.
Basic information architecture policies have been
developed including some strategic requirements, but
compliance with policies, standards and tools is not
consistently enforced. A formally defined data
administration function is in place, setting organisationwide
standards and is beginning to report on the delivery
and use of the information architecture. Organisationwide
automated data administration tools are emerging, but the processes and rules used are defined by database
software vendor offerings.
|
4 (Managed and Measurable) | The development and
enforcement of the information architecture is fully
supported by formal methods and techniques. The
process is responsive to changes and business needs.
Accountability for the performance of the architecture
development process is enforced and success of the
information architecture is being measured. Formal
training activities are defined, documented and
consistently applied. Supporting automated tools are
widespread, but are not yet integrated. Internal best
practices are shared and introduced to the process. Basic
metrics have been identified and a measurement system
is in place. The information architecture definition
process is proactive and focused on addressing future
business needs. The data administration organisation is
actively involved in all application development efforts
to ensure consistency. An automated repository is fully
implemented and more complex data models are being
implemented to leverage the information content of the
databases. Executive information systems and decision
support systems are leveraging the available information.
|
5 Optimized | The information architecture is consistently
enforced at all levels and its value to the business is
continually stressed. IT personnel have the expertise and
skills necessary to develop and maintain a robust and
responsive information architecture that reflects all the
business requirements. The information provided by the
information architecture is consistently and extensively
applied. Extensive use is made of industry best practices
in the development and maintenance of the information
architecture including a continuous improvement
process. The strategy for leveraging information through
data warehousing and data mining technologies is
defined. The information architecture is continuously
improving and takes into consideration non-traditional
information on processes, organisations and systems.
|