| Key Goal Indicators | predefined measures that indicate if an IT process met its business requirements in terms of the relevant information criteria. KGIs are lag indicators and they indicate if we achieved our objectives.
|
- Enhanced performance and cost management
- Improved return on major IT investments
- Improved time to market
- Increased quality, innovation and risk management
- Appropriately integrated and standardised business processes
- Reaching new and satisfying existing customers
- Availability of appropriate bandwidth, computing power and IT delivery mechanisms
- Meeting requirements and expectations of the customer of the process on budget and on time
- Adherence to laws, regulations, industry standards and contractual commitments
- Transparency on risk taking and adherence to the agreed organisational risk profile
- Benchmarking comparisons of IT governance maturity
- Creation of new service delivery channels
|
| Key Performance Indicators | predefined measures that determine how well the IT process enables the goal to be achieved. They indicate whether or not a goal is likely to be achieved, and are good indicators of capabilities, practices, and skills. KPIs are lead indicators used to measure our progress towards our goal.
|
- Improved cost-efficiency of IT processes (costs vs. deliverables)
- Increased number of IT action plans for process improvement initiatives
- Increased utilisation of IT infrastructure
- Increased satisfaction of stakeholders (survey and number of complaints)
- Improved staff productivity (number of deliverables) and morale (survey)
- Increased availability of knowledge and information for managing the enterprise
- Increased linkage between IT and enterprise governance
- Improved performance as measured by IT balanced scorecards
|
| Critical Success Factors | highlight important issues or actions for management to achieve control over IT processes. CSFs are generally management-oriented implementation guidelines. They identify the most important factors from strategic, technical, organizational, or procedural perspectives.
|
- IT governance activities are integrated into the enterprise governance process and leadership behaviours
- IT governance focuses on the enterprise goals, strategic initiatives, the use of technology to enhance the business and on the availability of sufficient resources and capabilities to keep up with the business demands
- IT governance activities are defined with a clear purpose, documented and implemented, based on enterprise needs and with unambiguous accountabilities
- Management practices are implemented to increase efficient and optimal use of resources and increase the effectiveness of IT processes
- Organisational practices are established to enable: sound oversight; a control environment/culture; risk assessment as standard practice; degree of adherence to established standards; monitoring and follow up of control deficiencies and risks
- Control practices are defined to avoid breakdowns in internal control and oversight
- There is integration and smooth interoperability of the more complex IT processes such as problem, change and
configuration management
- An audit committee is established to appoint and oversee an independent auditor, focusing on IT when driving audit plans, and review the results of audits and third-party reviews.
|
| Maturity Models | are a method of measuring proficiency so that an organization can make a systematic attempt to improve. This approach is derived from the Maturity Model defined by the Software Engineering Institute for the maturity of software development capabilities.
|
- Non-existent: There is a complete lack of any
recognisable IT governance process. The organisation
has not even recognised that there is an issue to be
addressed and hence there is no communication about
the issue.
- Initial /Ad Hoc: There is evidence that the organisation
has recognised that IT governance issues exist and need
to be addressed. There are, however, no standardised
processes, but instead there are ad hoc approaches applied
on an individual or case-by-case basis. Management’s
approach is chaotic and there is only sporadic, nonconsistent
communication on issues and approaches to
address them. There may be some acknowledgement of
capturing the value of IT in outcome-oriented
performance of related enterprise processes. There is no
standard assessment process. IT monitoring is only
implemented reactively to an incident that has caused
some loss or embarrassment to the organisation.
- Repeatable but Intuitive: There is global awareness
of IT governance issues. IT governance activities and
performance indicators are under development, which
include IT planning, delivery and monitoring processes.
As part of this effort, IT governance activities are
formally established into the organisation’s change
management process, with active senior management
involvement and oversight. Selected IT processes are
identified for improving and/or controlling core
enterprise processes and are effectively planned and
monitored as investments, and are derived within the
context of a defined IT architectural framework.
Management has identified basic IT governance
measurements and assessment methods and techniques,
however, the process has not been adopted across the
organisation. There is no formal training and
communication on governance standards and
responsibilities are left to the individual. Individuals
drive the governance processes within various IT projects
and processes. Limited governance tools are chosen and implemented for gathering governance metrics, but may
not be used to their full capacity due to a lack of
expertise in their functionality.
- Defined Process: The need to act with respect to IT
governance is understood and accepted. A baseline set of
IT governance indicators is developed, where linkages
between outcome measures and performance drivers are
defined, documented and integrated into strategic and
operational planning and monitoring processes.
Procedures have been standardised, documented and
implemented. Management has communicated
standardised procedures and informal training is
established. Performance indicators over all IT
governance activities are being recorded and tracked,
leading to enterprise-wide improvements. Although
measurable, procedures are not sophisticated, but are the
formalisation of existing practices. Tools are
standardised, using currently available techniques. IT
Balanced Business Scorecard ideas are being adopted by
the organization. It is, however, left to the individual to
get training, to follow the standards and to apply them.
Root cause analysis is only occasionally applied. Most
processes are monitored against some (baseline) metrics,
but any deviation, while mostly being acted upon by
individual initiative, would unlikely be detected by
management. Nevertheless, overall accountability of key
process performance is clear and management is
rewarded based on key performance measures.
- Managed and Measurable: There is full
understanding of IT governance issues at all levels,
supported by formal training. There is a clear
understanding of who the customer is and responsibilities
are defined and monitored through service level
agreements. Responsibilities are clear and process
ownership is established. IT processes are aligned with
the business and with the IT strategy. Improvement in IT
processes is based primarily upon a quantitative
understanding and it is possible to monitor and measure
compliance with procedures and process metrics. All
process stakeholders are aware of risks, the importance
of IT and the opportunities it can offer. Management has
defined tolerances under which processes must operate.
Action is taken in many, but not all cases where
processes appear not to be working effectively or efficiently. Processes are occasionally improved and best
internal practices are enforced. Root cause analysis is
being standardised. Continuous improvement is
beginning to be addressed. There is limited, primarily
tactical, use of technology, based on mature techniques
and enforced standard tools. There is involvement of all
required internal domain experts. IT governance evolves
into an enterprise-wide process. IT governance activities
are becoming integrated with the enterprise governance
- Optimised: There is advanced and forward-looking
understanding of IT governance issues and solutions.
Training and communication is supported by leadingedge
concepts and techniques. Processes have been
refined to a level of external best practice, based on
results of continuous improvement and maturity
modeling with other organisations. The implementation
of these policies has led to an organisation, people and
processes that are quick to adapt and fully support IT governance requirements. All problems and deviations
are root cause analysed and efficient action is expediently
identified and initiated. IT is used in an extensive,
integrated and optimised manner to automate the
workflow and provide tools to improve quality and
effectiveness. The risks and returns of the IT processes
are defined, balanced and communicated across the
enterprise. External experts are leveraged and
benchmarks are used for guidance. Monitoring, selfassessment
and communication about governance
expectations are pervasive within the organisation and
there is optimal use of technology to support
measurement, analysis, communication and training.
Enterprise governance and IT governance are
strategically linked, leveraging technology and human
and financial resources to increase the competitive
advantage of the enterprise.
|