H: The Service Management Process Maturity Framework

The process maturity framework (PMF) can be used either as a framework to assess the maturity of each of the Service Management processes individually, or to measure the maturity of the Service Management process as a whole. This is an approach that has been widely used in the IT industry for a number of years, with many proprietary models being used by a number of organizations. This particular PMF has been developed to bring a common, best practice approach to the review and assessment of Service Management process maturity. This framework, which is shown in Figure H.1, can be used by organizations to internally review their own Service Management processes as well as third-party organizationbrought in as external reviewers, assessors or auditors.

The use of the PMF in the assessment of Service Management processes relies on an appreciation of the IT Organization Growth Model. The maturity of the Service Management processes is heavily dependent on the stage of growth of the IT organization as a whole. It is difficult, if not impossible, to develop the maturity of the Service Management processes beyond the maturity and capability of the overall IT organization. The maturity of the IT organization is not just dependent on the maturity of the Service Management processes. Each level requires a change of a combination of elements in order to be fully effective. Therefore a review of processes will require an assessment to be completed against the five areas of:

These are the five areas described within the PMF for assessing process maturity. The major characteristics of each level of the PMF are as follows.

Figure H. 1 Process maturity framework
Figure H. 1 Process maturity framework

Initial (Level 1)
The process has been recognized but there is little or no process management activity and it is allocated no importance, resources or focus within the organization. This level can also be described as 'ad hoc' or occasionally even 'chaotic'.

Vision and steeringMinimal funds and resources with little activity

Results temporary, not retained

Sporadlc reports and reviews

ProcessLoosely defined processes and procedures, used reactively when problems occur

Totally reactive processes

Irregular, unplanned activities

PeopleLoosely defined roles or responsibilities
TechnologyManual processes or a few specific, discrete tools (pockets/islands)
CultureTool and technology-based and driven with a strong activity focus
Table H.1 PMF Level 1: initial

Repeatable (Level 2)
The process has been recognized and is allocated little importance, resource or focus within the operation. Generally activities related to the process are uncoordinated, irregular, without direction and are directed towards process effectiveness.

Vision and steeringNo clear objectives or formal targets

Funds and resources available

Irregular, unplanned activities, reporting and reviews

ProcessDefined processes and procedures

Largely reactive process

Irregular, unplanned activities

PeopleSelf-contained roles and responsibilities
TechnologyMany discrete tools, but a lack of control

Data stored in separate locations

CultureProduct and service-based and driven
Table H.2 PMF Level 2: repeatable

Defined (Level 3)
The process has been recognized and is documented but there is no formal agreement, acceptance or recognition of its role within the IT operation as a whole. However, the process has a process owner, formal objectives and targets with allocated resources, and is focused on the efficiency as well as the effectiveness of the process. Reports and results are stored for future reference.

Vision and steeringDocumented and agreed formal objectives and targets

Formally published, monitored and reviewed plans

Well-funded and appropriately resourced

Regular, planned reporting and reviews

ProcessClearly defined and well-publicized processes and procedures

Regular, planned activities

Good documentation

Occasionally proactive process

PeopleClearly defined and agreed roles and responsibilities

Formal objectives and targets

Formalized process training plans

TechnologyContinuous data collection with alarm and threshold monitoring

Consolidated data retained and used for formal planning, forecasting and trending

CultureService and Customer-oriented with a formalized approach
Table H.3 PMF Level 3: defined

Managed (Level 4)
The process has now been fully recognized and accepted throughout IT. It is service focused and has objectives and targets that are based on business objectives and goals. The process is fully defined, managed and has become proactive, with documented, established interfaces and dependencies with other IT process.

Vision and steeringClear direction with business goals, objectives and formal targets, measured progress

Effective management reports actively used

Integrated process plans linked to business and IT plans

Regular improvements, planned and reviewed

ProcessWell-defined processes, procedures and standards, included in all IT staff job descriptions

Clearly defined process interfaces and dependencies

Integrated Service Management and systems development processes

Mainly proactive process

PeopleInter- and intra-process team working Responsibilities clearly defined in all IT job descriptions
TechnologyContinuous monitoring measurement, reporting and threshold alerting to a centralized set of integrated toolsets, databases and processes
CultureBusiness focused with an understanding of the wider issues
Table H.4 PMF Level 4: managed

Optimizing (Level 5)
The process has now been fully recognized and has strategic objectives and goals aligned with overall strategic business and IT goals. These have now become 'institutionalized' as part of the everyday activity for everyone involved with the process. A self-contained continual process of improvement is established as part of the process, which is now developing a pre-emptive capability.

Vision and steeringIntegrated strategic plans inextricably linked with overall business plans, goals and objectives

Continuous monitoring, measurement, reporting alerting and reviews linked to a continual process of improvement

Regular reviews and/or audits for effectiveness, efficiency and compliance

ProcessWell-defined processes and procedures part of corporate culture

Proactive and pre-emptive process

PeopleBusiness aligned objectives and formal targets actively monitored as part of the everyday activity

Roles and responsibilities part of an overall corporate culture

TechnologyWell-documented overall tool architecture with complete integration in all areas of people, processes and technology
CultureA continual improvement attitude, together with a strategic business focus. An understanding of the value of IT to the business and its role within the business value chain
Table H.5 PMF Level 5: optimizing

This maturity framework is aligned with the Software Engineering Institute Capability Maturity Model® Integration (SEI CMMI) and their various maturity models including the evolving CMMI-SVC, which focuses on the delivery of services.

[To top of Page]


Visit my web site