Service Transition

1Introduction 2Serv. Mgmt. 3Principles 4Processes 5Activities 6Organization 7Consideration 8Implementation 9Issues AAppendeces

Organizing for Service Transition

6.1ROLES 6.2ORG CONTEXT 6.3ORG MODELS 6.4PROCESS INTERFACES

A characteristic of a process is that all related activities need not necessarily be limited to one specific organizational unit. SACM, for example, can be conducted in departments such as Service Operation, application management, network management, systems development and non-IT departments like procurement. Since processes and their activities run through a whole organization, the activities should be mapped to the existing IT departments or sections and coordinated by process managers. Once detailed procedures and work instructions have been developed, an organization will then map its staff to the activities of the process. Clear definitions of accountability and responsibility are critical success factors for any process implementation. Without this, roles and responsibilities within the new or changed process can be confusing, and individuals might revert to how the activities were handled before the new or changed procedures were put in place.

[To top of Page]

6.1 GENERIC ROLES

Responsibility for each process and service must be allocated for effective delivery of that service or process. All staff involved in process and service delivery need to understand these roles and to be aware of where that responsibility lies. These owner roles are not necessarily a person dedicated for each process or service. The two key roles, process owner and service owner, are set out below.

6.1.1 Process Owner Role
The process owner is responsible for ensuring that all activities defined within the process are undertaken and is responsible for:

6.1.2 Service Owner Role
The service owner is responsible to the customer for the initiation, transition and ongoing maintenance and support of a particular service.

The service owner has the following responsibilities:

[To top of Page]

6.2 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT FOR TRANSITIONING A SERVICE

Other organizational units and third parties need to have clearly defined interface and handover points with Service Transition to ensure the delivery of the defined deliverables within the agreed schedule. Programmes, projects, Service Design and suppliers are responsible for the delivery of service assets and components in accordance with the requirements of the Service Design, SLAs and contracts in addition to initiating any changes that affect a service release or deployment.

Service Transition will acquire changes, service assets and components from these parties. An example Service Transition organization is illustrated in Figure 6.1 in addition to other teams within the IT services organization.

Figure 6.1 Example of Service Transition organization and its interfaces
Figure 6.1 Example of Service Transition organization and its interfaces

As shown above, there are interfaces to projects and business operations that need to be clearly defined. It is essential that throughout the Service Management lifecycle there is clear interaction and understanding of responsibility by all that neither element can work in isolation. It is critical that projects have a clear understanding of Service Design, transition and operations requirements and objective of delivery, and vice versa.

Often projects and programmes will work in isolation from Service Transition and operations, believing that they have no part to play in the ongoing service delivery. Similarly, transition and operations can ignore ongoing project activity; working on the basis that they will only be concerned about it once it is 'their turn' to deal with it. This is a very short-sighted approach and one that should be removed. Cooperation, understanding and mutual respect are critical to ensuring that new, changed and ongoing delivery of services to the customer are optimized.

Figure 6.2 illustrates the required interaction between programmes, projects and Service Management elements. During the release and deployment there will be interactions with the business, customers and users and these responsibilities are defined in this section.

Figure 6.2 Organizational interfaces for a Service Transition
Figure 6.2 Organizational interfaces for a Service Transition

[To top of Page]

6.3 ORGANIZATION MODELS TO SUPPORT SERVICE TRANSITION

Many people and processes are involved in Service Transition. Some of the key organization requirements that support the application of ITIL best practices for Service Transition are described in this section.

6.3.1 Management of Service Transition
Service Transition requires active management, with recognition of its key role in delivering effective IT services within an organization. One key element of this recognition is the allocation of the role of Service Transition manager.

An example of a function or organizational structure for Service Transition is shown in Figure 6.3.
Figure 6.3 Example of an organization for Service Transition
Figure 6.3 Example of an organization for Service Transition

6.3.2 Service Transition Roles And Responsibilities
The specific roles and responsibilities covered within this section relate primarily to Service Transition, although they will be used to some extent by other processes within the Service Management lifecycle. These are:

Depending on the size of the organization and the scope of the service being transitioned, some of these roles will be combined and performed by one individual. However, service test management and physical testing must always be performed by resources independent of other functions or processes.

It is essential to recognize that all staff involved in Service Transition are responsible for:

6.3.2.1 The Service Transition Manager
The Service Transition manager has day-to-day management and control of the Service Transition teams and their activities. The prime responsibilities for this role a re:
6.3.2.2 Planning And Support
Planning and support may not be a direct responsibility of the Service Transition manager, as in some organizations this function may be consolidated into an overall Service Management office/IT planning responsibility. Regardless of where this function sits, the role must still be performed.

This function provides support for the Service Transition teams and people. The activities include:

6.3.2.3 Service Asset And Configuration Management And Change Management Roles
Service Design is responsible for designing the baselines appropriate for the service and identifying the relevant assets and CIs with input from the business change manager(s) and others who have responsibilities for delivering services and maintaining business continuity.

During the first stages of a project the programme or project office may be responsible for administering the Configuration Management process, maintaining copies of relevant documentation concerning the CIs, and controlling the release of CIs following appropriate approvals. At defined release points for a service and service package, the programme or project office will pass responsibility to Service Transition who will take responsibility for Configuration Management of the Cl documentation.

Responsibilities for reviewing and approving assets and CIs across the service lifecycle and during deployment need to be defined and allocated to individuals with appropriate skills and authority. Role specifications for the Change Management, Service Asset and Configuration Management teams need to be developed. Typical roles include:

Assign the configuration manager and other key roles as early as possible, because assigned individuals can then be involved in the implementation. For some operational activities Configuration Management will require staff who will adopt a diligent approach and pay due attention to detail.

The Service Asset Manager
The service asset manager has the following responsibilities:

The Configuration Manager
The configuration manager has the following responsibilities:

The Configuration Analyst
The configuration analyst has the following responsibilities:

The Configuration Administrator/Librarian
The configuration administrator/librarian is the custodian and guardian of all master copies of software, assets and documentation CIs registered with Asset and Configuration Management. The major tasks of this role are to:

The configuration administrator/librarian has the following specific responsibilities:

The CMS/Tools Administrator
The CMS/tools administrator has the following responsibilities:

The Configuration Control Board
The Configuration Control Board is required to ensure that the overarching intention and policies of Configuration Management are employed throughout the Service Management lifecycle and with specific consideration for every aspect of the complete service. The Board has the following responsibilities:

In some organizations, the Configuration Control Board will be combined with change, thereby providing a holistic view of the current and proposed services and service models, enabling better control, change evaluation, impact assessment and understanding.

The Change Authority
Formal authorization is obtained for each change from a change authority that may be a role, person or a group of people. The levels of authorization for a particular type of change should be judged by the type, size or risk of the change, e.g. changes in a large enterprise that affect several distributed sites may need to be authorized by a higher-level change authority such as a Global Change Board or the Board of Directors.

The culture of the organization dictates, to a large extent, the manner in which changes are authorized. Hierarchical structures may well impose many levels of change authorization, while flatter structures may allow a more streamlined approach.

A degree of delegated authority may well exist within an authorization level, e.g. delegating authority to a change manager according to pre-set parameters relating to:

An example of authorization hierarchy is shown in Figure 4.5, Example of a change authorization model.

The Change Manager
The main duties of the change manager, some of which may be delegated, are listed below:

Change Advisory Board
A Change Advisory Board (CAB) is an advisory body. It needs to have appropriate terms of reference (e.g. meeting regularity, scope of influence, and links to programme management).

To understand more about the specific role and responsibilities of the CAB, see paragraph 4.2.6.8.

6.3.2.4 Performance And Risk Evaluation Management
The following roles all provide input into the performance and risk evaluation of the Service Transition processes and key decision making, e.g. stopping or holding the deployment.

The Performance And Risk Evaluation Manager
The performance and risk evaluation manager has the following responsibilities:

6.3.2.5 Service Knowledge Management
Knowledge Management requires effective and authoritative ownership within an organization. The role of the Knowledge Management process owner is crucial, in that it will design, deliver and maintain the Knowledge Management strategy, process and procedures.

The Knowledge Management Process Owner
The Knowledge Management process owner has the following responsibilities:

6.3.2.6 Service Test Manager
Service test management is primarily responsible for the test support and the test team(s) functions involved with the specific Service Transition. The service test manager will report to the Service Transition manager as will the release and deployment manager; however, these roles should always be undertaken by separate people, and never be combined, to ensure that there is always independent testing and test verification.

The service test manager has the following responsibilities:

Test Support
The prime responsibility of the test support team is to provide independent testing of all components delivered within the Service Transition programme or project. Responsibilities required to deliver successful service testing include the following, however, not all of these are the direct responsibility of the test support team:

6.3.2.7 Release And Deployment
Release and deployment is primarily responsible for managing all aspects of the end-to-end release process. The release and deployment manager will report to the Service Transition manager as will the service test manager; however these roles should always be undertaken by separate people, and never be combined, .to ensure that there is always independent testing and test verification.

The Release And Deployment Manager
The release and deployment manager is responsible for the planning, design, build, configuration and testing of all software and hardware to create the release package for the delivery of, or changes to, the designated service.

The release and deployment manager has the following responsibilities:

However, some of these responsibilities will be delegated to the relevant release team sub-process.

The main components to be controlled are:

All deliverables need to be managed effectively, from development or purchasing, through customization and configuration, through testing and implementation, to operation in the live environment.

6.3.2.8 Release Packaging And Build
Release packaging and build management is the flow of work (establish requirements, design, build, test, deploy, operate and optimize) to deliver applications and infrastructure that meet the Service Design requirements.

The Release Packaging And Build Manager
The release packaging and build manager has the following responsibilities:

The release packaging and build manager cannot perform this role in isolation; other functions with which there will be significant interface are: Security Management

6.3.2.9 Deployment
Deployment staff have the following responsibilities:
6.3.2.10 Early Life Support
It is often believed that early life support starts when the service has actually been transitioned into operational use. This is not the case. Early life support should be considered as an integral role within the release and deployment phase. Early life support staff have the following key responsibilities:

6.3.2.11 Build And Test Environment Management
The build and test environment function is primarily to ensure that all the relevant people have the appropriate environments, test data, versioned software etc. available at the time that they need it and for the right purpose. As environment resources are normally limited, this role performs a coordinating and sometimes arbitrary role to ensure that resources are used to maximum effect.

Build and test environment staff have the following key responsibilities:

[To top of Page]

6.4 SERVICE TRANSITION RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LIFECYCLE STAGES

Service Transition is presented as a discrete lifecycle step, but this should not be taken to imply that it can stand alone. Service Transition exists to deliver the concepts documented within Service Design through to Service Operations for day-to-day management, and so without design and operations it has no purpose.

6.4.1 Upstream Relationships For Service Transition
6.4.1.1 Logical Staff Mobility
Service Transition takes its shape and input from the strategy set by the organization and from the new or changed services it is charged with bringing into live operation, i.e. by the output of the Service Design stage. Its very nature is therefore dependent on its relationship with 'upstream areas'.

In most organizations, many staff will deliver tasks appropriate to more than one lifecycle stage. Indeed, the skills and experience accumulated by Service Transition and Service Operations staff will typically be valuable in the stages upstream of their nominal focus.

Figure 6.4 Flow of experience
Figure 6.4 Flow of experience

Specifically, Service Transition will depend on appropriate experience from operations skilled staff to deliver much of the knowledge required to make key decisions, based on predicting likely successful practice based on previous behaviour of systems in similar situations, as shown in Figure 6.4.

When Service Design establishes the best transition approach, and when, within Service Transition, the continued viability of that approach is assessed, Service Transition and Service Operation are best placed to play the role of subject matter expert, and provide input to the assessment and evaluation of the design's initial and ongoing viability.

Service Operation people will be involved in (design and) operations tasks directly via population of the Service Knowledge Management System with precedents and experiences detected during Service Operation stages - e.g. through incident-problem-error cycles. This will drive informed and correct decision making processes and facilitate more effective Service Transition.

In order to retain and make effective use of experience, staff may well find themselves allocated (fully or partially) from operations tasks to support a design exercise and then follow that service through Service Transition. They may then, via early life support activities, move into support of the new or changed services they have been involved in designing and implementing into the live environment.

Expert advice on transition (as with design and operations) will also provide expert input to the development and maintenance of Service Strategy.

6.4.1.2 Process Communications
Many of the capabilities of a service that require testing and acceptance with transition are established and approach and measures set within design. As described above, this exercise is likely to have involved Service Transition staff, either through direct involvement (perhaps even formal secondment) or through consultation and expert advice.

6.4.2 Downstream Process And Procedure Influence
Many elements initiated or perfected during Service Transition will be established and become key elements within Service Operation.

During transition testing incidents will be detected that reveal errors within the new or changed service. The nature and identified resolution of these errors will provide direct input to the Service Operations procedures for supporting the new or changed service in live use. Service Transition input is likely to affect most areas of the operations stage.

Testing will share processes with operations, possibly with some variations in procedure, e.g. to accommodate the differing requirements and risk environments of analysing and rectifying errors in testing and live environments.

Where testing detects errors in a new or changed service that are not significant enough to prevent the release of the service, these errors are released into the live known error database, and notification is passed to Continual Service Improvement, via the SKMS, which CSI will make extensive use of.

[To top of Page]


Visit my web site